← Back to brief
project active deal chris hart
memory · project_active_deal_chris_hart.md
Stage
discovery_complete — initial conversation captured 2026-04-27 (transcript: notes/2026-04-27_chris-hart-308-balsam-initial-conversation_full-transcript.txt).
History
- 2026-04-23 — Rachel vetoed initial inquiry citing "no hot tub". Joseph sent polite-decline reply 9:27 PM MDT (thread
19dbc3da0af806ca). Closed at the time. - 2026-04-27 — Initial discovery conversation re-opened. Held the door open, captured property + intent context.
- 2026-04-28 BD meeting (Joe + Rachel) — Decision: re-engage with proper benchmarking. Rachel agreed to provide 19th Hole + Indian Trail property data; Joseph to conduct comp analysis and submit for Rachel review before any customer-facing send.
- 2026-04-29 — Stalled-deal-watchdog flagged "no deal node yet"; nightly consolidation created
deal:chris_hart_308_balsam in knowledge graph.
Next action
1. Wait on Rachel — receive 19th Hole + Indian Trail property data
2. Joseph — run benchmarking analysis (Track actuals + KeyData market trend) per skyrun-builder 6-source data sourcing rule
3. Joseph — send analysis to Rachel for review BEFORE any customer-facing send (per Rachel pattern: "I would love to see them before you send them out")
4. After Rachel sign-off, send written info to Chris (per BD-meeting commitment)
Property
308 Balsam Dr, Granby — see property:308_balsam_dr_granby in knowledge graph
Commission at stake
$1,000 (Bowens Sourced) at current discovery stage; close probability ~10% (NURTURE-equivalent until benchmarking validates the numbers)
Why this matters
Chris Hart is the second time Rachel-vetoed-then-re-engaged in two weeks (first was reverse — she vetoed Beegle 4/27, no recovery). The pattern: hot-tub vetoes can sometimes be re-opened with strong comp data. If Joseph lands this benchmarking cleanly, it sets a precedent for future borderline-property re-engagements.